The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced today the outcome of its investigations into the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR) fixing.
Nine of the banks designated as HIBOR reference banks were required to appoint external firms, approved by the HKMA, to examine the relevant communication records (such as internal and external chat messages) for periods between 2005 and 2012. Using the same rigorous methodology that was adopted in similar benchmark investigations overseas, the process covered over 31 million communication records and numerous inquiries and interviews with bank staff involved in the HIBOR fixing. The HKMA found evidence of misconduct in the submission of HIBOR rates by only one bank, and no evidence of collusion between these banks to rig the HIBOR fixing.
In the investigation of UBS AG (UBS), the HKMA found about 100 communication records during 2006 to 2009, in the form of internal chat messages, which contained change requests by several UBS traders to the UBS HIBOR submitter with a view to rigging the HIBOR fixing. In October 2010, UBS ceased to be a HIBOR reference bank and no longer makes submissions for the HIBOR fixing.
The HKMA investigation also found that UBS failed to report to the HKMA misconduct of its staff relating to the change requests when the bank became aware of these activities. Such failure is unacceptable because prompt reporting of the matter was essential in enabling the HKMA to take timely supervisory or other follow-up actions. Further, the investigation found material weaknesses in UBS’s internal controls and governance in managing the HIBOR submission process and in other areas.
In the light of the above investigation findings, the HKMA has required UBS to:
The HKMA will consider whether further supervisory actions will be needed in light of UBS’s compliance with the above requirements.
An HKMA spokesperson said, “The HKMA is committed to protecting the integrity of the HIBOR benchmark fixing mechanism. In May 2013, the HKMA promulgated a statutory guideline on “Code of Conduct for Benchmark Submitters” to enhance the robustness of the benchmark fixing mechanism, including HIBOR. The HKMA expects all benchmark-setting banks to maintain proper oversight for such activities and put in place adequate and effective systems of control.” The spokesperson added, “As for UBS, the bank has cooperated with the HKMA’s investigation and agreed to comply with the requirements by taking appropriate follow-up actions promptly. The case is a clear reminder to all banks of their duty to uphold robust internal controls and governance and to take adequate measures to prevent and detect internal improprieties.”
On 19 December 2012, the HKMA announced that it had commenced an investigation of UBS after receiving information from overseas authorities about possible misconduct by the bank in its submissions for the HIBOR fixing. The HKMA later extended the exercise to cover 8 other banks, namely Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Citibank, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank, Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland and Société Générale. In February 2014, the HKMA required another bank to conduct an external review of its communication records, which is in progress, based on information warranting follow-up actions by the HKMA.
The investigation of UBS found that between September 2006 and June 2009, six traders and the HIBOR submitter of the bank (all of them have left UBS) communicated in about 100 internal chat messages which contained change requests with a view to rigging the bank’s submissions for the HIBOR fixing. There is evidence that about one-third of these change requests affected the HIBOR fixing rates submitted by UBS. For the remaining two-thirds, there is no evidence to suggest that the outcome of the HIBOR fixing was impacted. According to the HKMA’s estimate, the UBS change requests had negligible impact on the actual outcome of the HIBOR fixing.
Hong Kong Monetary Authority
14 March 2014