Key Information

Speeches by Speaker
Norman T.L. Chan
Peter Pang
Eddie Yue
Arthur Yuen
Zeti Akhtar Aziz
Raymond Li
Edmond Lau
Esmond Lee
Meena Datwani
Vincent W.S. Lee
James Lau
Joseph Yam
Y K Choi
William Ryback
David Carse
Tony Latter
Andrew Sheng
Hans Genberg
Simon Topping
Michael Taylor
The Honourable Donald Tsang
Chen Yuan
Dai Xianglong
Don Brash
Jaime Caruana
Andrew Crockett
Mario Draghi
David Eldon
Stanley Fischer
Timothy F. Geithner
Stephen Grenville
Kenneth G. Lay
William McDonough
Ernest Patrikis
Glenn Stevens
Jean-Claude Trichet
Tarisa Watanagase
Zeti Akhtar Aziz
Carmen Chu
Alan Au
Press Releases
Press Releases by Category
Bogus Voice Message Phone Calls
Banking in Hong Kong
Fraudulent Websites, E-mails and Telephone System, and other fraud cases
Granting of Banking Licences
Exchange Fund
Table of Multiples of Notes and Payments for Allotted Amount under non-competitive tender
Table of Multiples of Notes and Payments of Application Amount under non-competitive tender
Tender of Exchange Fund Bills and Notes
Tender Results of Exchange Fund Bills and Notes
Tentative Issuance Schedule for Exchange Fund Bills and Notes
Appointments and Departures
HKMA Pay Review
HKMA Publications
The Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation
Hong Kong Note Printing Limited
Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research
Exchange Fund Investment Limited
Hong Kong Financial Infrastructure
International Relations
Investment Products Related to Lehman Brothers
Monetary Policy
Notes and Coins
Renminbi business
Credit Card Lending Survey
Monetary Statistics
Residential Mortgage Survey
Year 2000
Guidelines and Circulars

Guideline No. 5.9.4

Guideline No. 5.9.4

Property Lending

I am writing to the Chief Executives of all authorized institutions in the light of the rise in residential mortgage lending and in other types of property lending which has occurred in the first half of this year.

According to the results of our monthly survey, residential mortgage lending by the 33 institutions included in the survey rose by 2.7% in June. The increase in the first half of the year was 34% (annualized). This rapid growth has helped to fuel the rise in property prices during the same period. The risk to the lending institutions increases in overheated market conditions if prices subsequently correct sharply. Rapid growth in lending also puts additional strain on balance sheets, as demonstrated by the deterioration in the Hong Kong dollar loan-to-deposit ratio during the course of this year.

The HKMA expects all lending institutions to adopt a prudent and responsible attitude to their property lending. In the light of market conditions during the first half of the year, we have considered whether some additional tightening of lending criteria is required. At present this does not seem necessary, though it is not ruled out for the future. The market has cooled recently in the light of the Government's intention to increase the supply of residential property and to deal resolutely with speculation. What seems required at this stage therefore is that institutions should strictly apply existing criteria and should not be relaxing these.

It is not our intention to repeat all the HKMA's existing guidelines in relation to residential mortgage lending, but rather to emphasize and elaborate on certain key aspects as set out below.

  1. Strict application of the existing 70% and 60% loan to value ratios
    There are continuing reports that some institutions are offering "top-up" loans in relation to residential mortgages. Such loans may take a variety of forms, but for the purposes of this letter they are described as "personal loans". While in theory such loans are intended to be used for such purposes as to decorate the property or to buy furniture, in practice they may be used to help finance the downpayment on the property.

    Such a practice is unacceptable and contrary to existing HKMA guidelines. To reduce the risk that borrowers are relying on such top-up loans to increase their leverage, the HKMA considers that :

    • personal loans (eg for decoration purposes) should not be advertised, or offered to borrowers, as part of a "package" involving a residential mortgage loan.
    • where a personal loan is granted, as a separate credit decision, to an applicant to whom the institution is in the process of also granting a residential mortgage loan, drawdown of the personal loan should only be permitted after completion of the purchase of the property. This will provide some assurance that the personal loan is not being used to finance the downpayment .
    • any such personal loan should be on normal personal loan terms, and have a maturity no longer than a normal personal loan maturity
  2. Assessment of the borrower's ability to repay

    All institutions must have a clearly defined and documented policy to assess the repayment capability of residential mortgage borrowers. This should include the use of a debt servicing ratio (DSR) test. The DSR is defined as the monthly repayment obligations of the borrower as a percentage of monthly income. The ratio should be no higher than 50-60% of income, though the upper end of this range should be confined to higher income earners.

    As regards the calculation of the DSR, the following are the key points:

    • the amount of the "debt service" should include all monthly repayments relating to the mortgage loan application under review and all other debt repayments known to the institution (eg arising from personal loans granted by the institution, co-financing loans provided by property developers and credit facilities from other institutions if these can be ascertained).
    • to make a sufficiently comprehensive assessment of the amount of the debt service, institutions should conduct reasonable checks on the extent of the borrower's other financial obligations, eg by enquiring whether the borrower has other existing mortgages or by reviewing the borrower's bank statements/account records.
    • where part of the full debt service cost incurred by the borrower is deferred for a period (eg because of an interest "holiday"), the full eventual servicing cost should be included in the DSR calculation right from the start.
    • the current income of the borrower should be used in the DSR calculation and no allowance should be made for any expected future income increase.
    • the income of other household members should not be taken into account in the DSR test unless such members have provided a formal guarantee or the property is being acquired jointly with those members.
    • the institution must obtain income proof such as a salary statement or tax return from the borrower or guarantor.
  3. No relaxation of prudential lending criteria

    Institutions should not compete for additional market share in a manner which exposes them to increased risk. They should not therefore compete by relaxing criteria such as the DSR test or by reducing charges for early repayment of loans (these charges help to protect lending institutions through their deterrent effect on speculation). In particular, they should not relax such criteria or charges in order to obtain a share of the mortgage financing for specific new property developments.
  4. Avoidance of undue property concentration

    It remains the HKMA's view that those institutions whose property exposure* is above the overall industry average of about 40% of loans, should be attempting to stabilize or reduce that percentage. This applies particularly to those local institutions whose property exposure is also high in relation to capital base (although it is not the HKMA's intention to set a formal guideline in this respect).

    A specific way in which those institutions which have a higher than average percentage property exposure can attempt to stabilize that percentage is by not pursuing an aggressive pricing policy in order to attract new business. In other words, such institutions should not be market leaders in terms of any further reduction in the interest rate on residential mortgage loans.

    The HKMA intends to monitor the property exposure of authorized institutions on a more forward-looking basis by asking the more active participants to supply figures for the budgeted growth in the various types of property exposure for future periods. It will expect institutions largely to adhere to their budgeted rates of growth.

Monitoring and enforcement

The HKMA expects all institutions to comply with these guidelines and those previously issued. It will monitor this through spot checks carried out by its on-site examiners, and it will take a serious view of non-compliance. The HKMA may use the statutory powers under the Banking Ordinance to refuse to grant approvals to non-compliant institutions (eg to open new branches) or to place restrictions on the business of such institutions or to take action against the management concerned.

We look forward to the cooperation of all institutions in ensuring that the banking sector is not exposed to excessive risk in its property lending.

Last revision date: 1 August 2011
Tender Invitations
Legislative Council Issues
The HKMA Information Centre
Monetary Stability
Banking Stability
International Financial Centre
Exchange Fund
Annual Report
Half-Yearly Monetary & Financial Stability Report
Quarterly Bulletin
HKMA Background Briefs
Reference Materials
CMU Bond Price Bulletin
Economic & Financial Data for Hong Kong
Monthly Statistical Bulletin
Monetary Statistics
Press Releases
Guidelines & Circulars
Forthcoming Events
Information in Other Languages (Bahasa Indonesia, हिन्दी, नेपाली, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ, Tagalog, ไทย, اردو)
Account Opening
Consumer Corner
Consumer Education Programme
Complaints about Banks
Complaints about SVF Licensees
Internet Banking
Fraudulent Bank Websites, Phishing E-mails and Similar Scams
Be Careful of Bogus Phone Calls and SMS Messages
Authenticate the Callers and Bank Hotline Numbers
Register of AIs & LROs
Register of Securities Staff of AIs
Register of SVF Licensees
Investment Products Related to Lehman Brothers
Photo Gallery